[Omake] LaTeX bug with BIBINPUTS.
Aleksey Nogin
nogin at cs.caltech.edu
Wed Jul 5 10:09:22 PDT 2006
On 05.07.2006 08:28, Geoffrey Alan Washburn wrote:
> I just noticed that if I do the following:
>
> TEXINPUTS[]=
> $(dir .)
> $(dir ./support)
> $(TEXINPUTS)
>
>
> BIBINPUTS[]=
> $(dir .)
> $(dir ./bib)
>
> When running LaTeX OMake will set TEXINPUTS and BIBINPUTS to be the same
> as TEXINPUTS, throwing away my BIBINPUTS definition.
Well, right, didn't we already discuss this about a year ago? Somehow we
never managed to resolve it - the general agreement seems to be that we
need some good general way of associating OMake variables with
environment variables. For TEXINPUTS vs BIBINPUTS specifically - I do
not know if we necessarily want to follow the TeX's model of having a
huge number of different variables - I'd rather just have TEXINPUTS be
responsible for everything. It is true that naming it TEXINPUTS could
have been a bad idea as it creates an expectation that the other
"standard" names would work as well, but I am not sure if it would be
worth it to rename it now.
--
Aleksey Nogin
Home Page: http://nogin.org/
E-Mail: nogin at cs.caltech.edu (office), aleksey at nogin.org (personal)
Office: Moore 04, tel: (626) 395-2200
More information about the Omake
mailing list