[Omake] venv_active_channels in var3

[Jason Hickey]

The new scheme is better, because it removes the need to keep track  
of channels for marshaling purposes.  So yes, it is better to use the  
var2 code.

Jason

On Sep 10, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Aleksey Nogin wrote:

> Jason,
>
> The var3 branch used to add (compared to var2) a venv_active_channels
> field to venv_runtime. In revs 12122, and 12124 on the 0.9.8.x branch
> you have changed how the channels are handled in venv_runtime. Do we
> still need the venv_active_channels? Or should I just use the var2  
> code
> (which includes the new 0.9.8.x changes) in var3 now?
>
> Aleksey
> _______________________________________________
> OMake-Devel mailing list
> OMake-Devel at metaprl.org
> https://lists.metaprl.org/mailman/listinfo/omake-devel

--
Jason Hickey                  http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~jyh
Caltech Computer Science      Tel: 626-395-6568 FAX: 626-792-4257