[Omake] SVN Commit: OMake Build System [0.9.8.x] (Rev. 10120)

[Aleksey Nogin]

On 28.02.2007 20:04, Jason Hickey wrote:

> 
> On Feb 28, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Aleksey Nogin wrote:
> 
>>       Also replaced "0" with NULL, where appropriate.
> 
> Thanks for the CAMLreturnT, that's cool.
> 
> No big deal, but the substitution 0/NULL is a gratuitous change.  Reverted.
> 
Yes, it is (I started making the change when I thought that was the
reason gcc was complaining about the CAMLreturn statements). OTOH, I in
general prefer an explicit NULL as this gives a better hint of the type
of the expession (e.g. figuring out what a "if (foo == NULL) { ... }" is
about is IMHO easier than "if (foo == 0) { ... }". Not a big deal, of
course.

Aleksey