[Omake] Lm_hash
Aleksey Nogin
nogin at metaprl.org
Wed Aug 22 12:48:54 PDT 2007
On 22.08.2007 12:08, Jason Hickey wrote:
> I've always been a bit troubled by this, but let me give an argument.
> Suppose I am an adversary and I want to produce hash collisions.
>
If we are concerned about intelligent adversaries, then we need to use
something cryptographically strong like SHA1. If not, then we only need
to care about:
- speed
- probability of getting too many collisions in a "regular" usage
scenario that does not involve an attacker.
I believe that my change increases the speed, has little chances of
introducing too many _accidental_ collisions, so it's a reasonable
change to make.
Aleksey
More information about the OMake-Devel
mailing list