[Omake] Lm_hash

Aleksey Nogin nogin at metaprl.org
Wed Aug 22 12:48:54 PDT 2007


On 22.08.2007 12:08, Jason Hickey wrote:

> I've always been a bit troubled by this, but let me give an argument.  
> Suppose I am an adversary and I want to produce hash collisions.
> 
If we are concerned about intelligent adversaries, then we need to use 
something cryptographically strong like SHA1. If not, then we only need 
to care about:
- speed
- probability of getting too many collisions in a "regular" usage 
scenario that does not involve an attacker.

I believe that my change increases the speed, has little chances of 
introducing too many _accidental_ collisions, so it's a reasonable 
change to make.

Aleksey


More information about the OMake-Devel mailing list